Introduction to:

                         Pages from the Mediterranean Sea

Around 1200 b.C., at the end of the Bronze Age, ended also a civilization begun perhaps onethousand years before, or still more ancient, contemporary of the great civilizations of the Middle East. At the beginning a native product: the Minoan period, and continued then, with the coming of Indo-Europeans populations, with the Micenaean one. For centuries historians and poets have conjectured and argued regarding the men and the events of that time (the War of Troy also, happened perhaps centuries before, was involved in the "legend"). Sure the imposing ruins of walls and cities were a reason for inspiration already in classical ages, indeed it can be said that, only three centuries after these destructions (when probably the Iliad and the Odissey were composed), the real sequence of events had been lost and those same ruins had become, in the opinion of the Hellenes, fruit of fights between Gods or jealousies and anger of Heroes. And it is on this "discrepancy"  between the poetic reality (which is also always a truth, even if hidden) and the archaeological, "scientific", truth, that I want to make some considerations.

 Regarding the history of Greece before the classical ages nothing up to now was known (the same for Italy and all continental Europe), unlike Near East, where already from 3500 b.C., with Egypt, many documentations have been left, both of writing and of true history; the only documents were artefacts (pottery, buildings, statues) and the legends that in historical age were told. For Greece, the only exceptions were the poetical masterpieces the Iliad and the Odissey, with which it effectively seemed modern people could get an idea of what had been the "civilization" before the advent of writing.
But, during archaeological excavations at the beginning of this century (particularly in Crete) by A.Evans, many clay tablets were discovered with registrations that, 50 years later, proved to be transcriptions of an archaic form of Greek, even if not directly to connect with any of the classic dialects (ionian,aeolian,etc..). The exact dating of these clay tablets is still uncertain, even if their state (baked by the fire) makes us think they were written contemporarily or a little time before the destruction of the palaces where they had been found. The most sure dating varies between the 1200 and 1100 a.C. The Aegean Sea on XIII cent. b.C.
The picture that those tablets (with bookeeping records of the palace) give of the life of that period (high organizational, artistic and commercial development) is not only in compliance with the archaeological finds, but indirectly confirms (even if only partially) the homeric description  of these small reigns, extended to some tens of kilometers, at most, from the Capital and on which "reigned" a (w)anax with characteristics and privileges similar to the kings about whom Homer tells. The reports these documents give is too much limited in time (maximum 2 years of book-keeping) and without any direct news of historical nature: they only testify that in that period that civilization came to an end, because until now no similar documents have been found. From other sources of other nature and other origin we can deduce that Greece in that century was hit by three different disasters:

- a devastating series of earthquakes (testified by the state of some ruins and also, as it seems, from geological studies)
- Repeated invasions and pillages of the Sea Peoples (cited in the aegyptian history and the Bible)

- the descent from the north of the Dorians, a greek tribe similar to the Micenaeans (sure for the language, less sure for race), historically the ancestors of the Spartans.

The succession or the frequency of the events remains however unknown.

Of these events, only one, the descent of Dorians, persisted in the memory of classical Greece, linked to the legend of the return of the Heraclides, to the Myth of Hercules. No echo instead by Homer of the three facts!  Perhaps the adventures and the wanderings of Odysseus reflect this period of piracy that produced and followed the fall of many civilizations, not only the micenaean one, all around the East-Mediterranean Sea, but in the Odysseia they aren't reminders of the great empires in the Middle East and especially of Egypt, with which we know the Micenaeans entertained commercial and political relationships.
The question is: why does Homer ignore those 3 historical facts?
While he is nearly an eyewitness of war situations and objects: he exactly describes a helm with the wild boar teeth as it has been found in Mycenae; he tells about Mycenae rich of gold and with wide streets; he describes furniture and mentions objects effectively recorded on the tablets; in the verses of the Iliad IV,509

  "..not of stone nor of iron is their flesh to resist the bronze that cleaveth the flesh, when they are smitten."
the poet is forced (voluntarily or involuntarily) to a historical nonsense: iron is known as a metal of high quality, but it is not used for the construction of weapons. It seems nearly that his poetry forces him to only one level of action for the events while makes him blind (!!) to some others.

After all, during all the narration (of the Iliad), the greatest effort of the poet seems to be a justification of the behavior of both opponents, as depending from the will or the whim of the Gods. To what end would have a Greek  "placed on the same footing" the two populations , the "anatolian" and the Greek, so different one from the other?  Or perhaps rather this "War against Troy" of Homer would not mask the description of  an "inner" conflict and the entire work as a start of a possible reconciliation, nearly a political attempt?  But pushing the hypotheses still more ahead:  if is not Troy the real city of which Homer speaks, could perhaps be one of the many cities besieged and destroyed from the Dorians?  Many of the linguistic characteristics of the Greek language spoken from the micenaean civilization remained at all unknown to the generations that came later, so it  can be asserted that the dorian invasion was like a genocide.  For a very long time the zones that had been left by the Mycenaeans appear to the archaeological analysis in a condition of impoverishment and abandonment and sure could not the dorian population (then lacedaemonean), that  had replaced the micenaean, assume the role that before it the last one had, even if  for approximately one hundred years, an artistic production with " micenaean style " was known in the Mediterranean Sea.
 According the opinion of some scholars (Latacz) the consequencies of those catastrophes couldn't have been at all decisive to the future developements in Greece' history (with the exception of dorian invasion in Peloponnese) : the mycenaean ruling class (the aristocracy) and a part of the population, could have found refuge in Athens, in Eubea and in Cyprus, where they could mantain their former style of life, and, last end, putting the basis for the ioniasn Renaissance of VIII century b.C.

[ the history of the Iliad therefore would have been this:  composed by Homer (or whoever he could be)  between the IX and VIII century b.C. (date generally accepted for the language in which it is composed), on the basis of a more ancient collection of poems of eyewitnesses ( see the fixed formulas and the epitheti of the protagonists). Poems originally describing events happened in  places  different from Troy.  And the poet is aware of this "transposition " and he cultivates it in order to support an "anti-dorian speech" or better already anti-lacedaemon or quite in order to anticipate the peace and an agreement between the communities.  J.Chadwick, in his book "The Mycenaean world ",  writes also of the possibility that the tradition of the poems goes back to a period antecedent the collapse of the micenean civilization:  to a period therefore in which the " no-Greek " elements were still predominant:  that could mean e.g. for  the Odysseia therefore the period in which, around  2000 b.C., the first Greeks were seeking for a land where to settle]
It is however difficult to think of a coalition of achaeans kingdoms, suffering by the end of the XIII century from various problems and attempting an attack to a city, Troy, stroken by the same events (e.g. the Sea-Peoples). Appearing of a new kind of pottery, the "coarse ware", contemporarly to the Late Helladic IIIC pottery, at the end of XII century, but far from the mediterranean tradition, in Troy, in Greece and in southern Italy could be, some scholars tell, among others J.B.Rutter (see the Link to his work on this Page), a proof for an invasion from the danubian area.

The recent discoveries of the campaign of excavations of the Prof. M.Korfmann at Troy (A seal with a luvian inscription in hittite
hieroglyphs), and the documents lack in Greek language for that age, would place Troy  in the hittite cultural space (as a vassall state), but the same campaigns of excavations would confirm the city as the battlefield described from Homer, who, while he seems to have only approximate acquaintance of the Peloponnese and Greece, could have seen in person, three or four centuries later,  the ruins  where to set the action of the Iliad.  And the setting, the "micenaean vocabulary", would be exactly to be attributed to unknown singers who, would have attended the still flourishing courts of the Peloponnese of the XIII and XII century b. C.  [ Actually the "historical" biographies still make the poet native of regions of  Anatolia ]
Another possible cause for the fall of the micenaean civilization (even if currently rejected by most of the scholars), or better a concomitant cause, given the certainty of the other events, could have been the explosion of social upheavals:  a so well organized society, and with such an high level of production, of commercial traffics (micenaean objects are found in all the Mediterranean area and also beyond), of prosperity of the more elevated classes, presupposed an exploitation of the lower classes. Sure is  the existence of slaves and also of workers, stablily engaged in many productions.  And here perhaps more strongly the homeric picture of a patriarchal society, would be far from the mycenean reality.  Perhaps the true punitive expedition (if this one indeed happened) was not of the Greeks against the Anatolians (Troians), but exactly the opposite one:  populations longing for vengeance of the abduction of women carried by the Mycenaeans in Anatolia for slavery:  a convenient labour force for a state  that  needed  more and more money.
 Here some for me very useful links:

 Troy VII and the Historicity of the Trojan War, by J.B. Rutter 
 Netsite of the Dig of Prof. M.Korfmann at Hissarlik/Troy  
 Oriental Institute of Chicago (ABZU) 
 Crane, Gregory R. (ed) The Perseus Project January 1999 
 The Homeland of the Hittites 
 Hellenic Ministry of Culture
 Archnet-WWW Virtual Library-Archaeology

Back to main page

Mussorgsky's "Gnome" by R. Finley